The Soft Whisper of Locomotion

After three days of sadness in this blog, I need to cheer myself up with a heaping helping of desire and beauty. The cornerstone of a healthy breakfast here at phicklphilly.

I’ve loved women’s legs since before I can remember. A life long leg-man. When Springtime hits in the city and the legs are bared in skirts and shorts, I’m constantly tantalized on a daily basis. Some men like boobs and some like butts, but for me, a woman’s means of propulsion is what turns me on. The legs that move her forward in the world are my very favorite thing.

Legs are, along with the eyes, the core of feminine sensuality. Not sexuality, that’s breasts, butt, and the like. Sensuality is the soft whisper compared to sexuality’s loud trumpet. I like soft whispers. They’re more fun.

The manner in which a woman walks, stands, sits. These tell you about her confidence at that moment. I suppose you could say it’s not the legs I’m attracted to but rather what the legs tell me about the woman. (But I still love legs!)

Researchers have spent far less time studying men’s attraction to women’s legs than the typical man on the street devotes to gazing at them . . . and maybe finding himself spellbound by them. So—to heterosexual males at least—what’s so special about female gams?

In preparation for this post, I first examined what evolutionary biologists have theorized about this phenomenon, and found most of their findings limited and inconclusive. Two of the scientists’ discoveries, however (see, e.g., “Why do men lust after women with long legs?”,, seem to confirm what most men (lay experts that they are!) already grasp intuitively. That is, studies have shown that (1) men prefer women with longer than average legs, and (2) they also favor women who have a higher leg length to body ratio —and, interestingly, the opposite is true of women’s preferences in men.

Still, my later investigation of several Web forums centering on this age-old, so-intriguing topic was much more fertile. And they are what constitute the main focus of this post. In essence, what I learned from these forums is that a man’s bestowing so much attention on a woman’s legs is perhaps best understood as a kind of “visual foreplay” for them.

Curiously, many forum respondents contrast women’s legs to their breasts and buttocks. In these comparisons, women’s legs are generally perceived as more suggestive, sensual, and seductive—whereas T & A are viewed as much more “in your face” sexual. One discussant, for example, sees women’s legs (along with their eyes) as representing the very “core of feminine sensuality,” proclaiming them a “soft whisper,” compared to the “loud trumpet” of more intimate, or private, parts of the female anatomy

In another forum (“Why are men attracted to women’s legs??”, Armageddon Online Forums), a respondent, obviously puzzled by his primary erotic preference, notes: “I love everything about the female body. However, for some reason, a sexy pair of legs is the first thing that grabs my attention . . . but why??” And, though hardly conscious of it, he partly answers his own question by admiringly describing women’s legs as “slender, soft, smooth and perfectly toned.” Moreover, he and many others allude to the length of female legs as itself contributing to their magnetic appeal and depicting an ideal of feminine pulchritude, which may, in fact, explain why tall fashion models far outnumber smaller ones.

It’s fascinating how many discussants on this topic seem to regard a woman’s legs aesthetically almost as much as they do sexually—as “monuments” of, or “testimony” to, a woman’s general comeliness or beauty. More than a century ago, Freud was so bold as to link the human aesthetic sense to sublimated sexual desire. And though there may be some question as to just how “sublimated” we can consider a man’s attraction to female legs, there’s no doubt that such an attentional focus is at a farther remove from other, more direct, points of male sexual interest—or to the sex act itself. To return to what I described earlier, wondrously gazing at a woman’s legs might have mostly to do with a man’s innate attraction to the sensual, rather than the more explicitly sexual. (That’s always been me)

Yet, regardless of how this attraction is appreciated, the word that probably best characterizes such an allure is tantalizing—or, in some cases, taunting. Note the words of this respondent: “With clothing, legs can . . . be both revealed and concealed, which makes them almost uniquely empowered to allow women to tease and seduce men and inflame their imaginations. Legs being long, a little can be revealed, then a little more, then . . . and so on, all the way up. It all depends on how much [the woman] wants to show. And sometimes less can be more. In addition, the momentary flash of legs through a slit skirt while a woman is in stride or crossing her legs can burn a potent image into a receptive man’s mind . . . [partly] because they suggest sexual availability”.

In brief, a woman’s legs can at once please . . . and tease. And while the partial display, or exposure, of a woman’s breasts or butt “function” more obviously in this seductive manner, it’s undeniable that for many men a pair of shapely legs alone have the power to effect this enthralled response.

Whenever I see a lovely pair of legs I feel that little dopamine drop of joy to carry me through my day.

Thank you, ladies, keep walking! I love you all!



Thank you for reading my blog. Please read, like, comment, and most of all follow Phicklephilly. I publish every day.

You can check out my books here:

Author: phicklephilly

Copyright © 2016 by Phicklephilly All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. All stories and characters are based on real people and events. The names and images have been changed to protect their privacy. Comment Rules: Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That’s how we’re gonna be — cool. Critical is fine, but if you’re rude, we’ll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation!”

5 thoughts on “The Soft Whisper of Locomotion”

  1. I think my legs are my best feature mostly because I spent well over a year going up and down 27 flights of stairs three times a day!!
    Unfortunately however I was not graced with LONG legs being the squat 5’2 that I am!!!
    I have learnt a little trick though…If I wear really short dresses,skirts or shorts and then heels….My legs look a LOT longer than they really are, in fact they look like they come all the way up to my arse…Oh wait…they do!!!

    1. I love this comment. Jad it speaks to the very antithesis of what I like. You’ve managed to comment and arouse me in the same moment. I prefer to refer to you as petite at 5’2″ not squat.

What are your thoughts on this subject?